Question
Most firms consider expert
individuals to be too elitist, temperamental, egocentric, and difficult to work
with. Force such people to collaborate on a high- stakes project and they just
might come to fisticuffs. Even the very notion of managing such a group seems
unimaginable. So, most organizations fall into the default mode, setting up
project teams of people who get along nicely.
Solution
The correct option
is B The result is mediocrity.
This paragraph is about negative character traits of expert individuals and how
there is avoided by firms.
The author leaves as at a peculiar place: how companies choose employees that
get along well. These cannot be experts because it is not in their nature to
get along well. So it has to be people who are not experts. A simple inference
we draw.
We continue the inference we have drawn above. People who are not experts are
not in a position to drive innovation or become experts. But we cannot say
their results will be disastrous as the passage mentions how well they get
along. So, we adopt a middle path and the choice that represents this balanced
approach,
Hence we have option (B) as the answer.
Write Here